Fuck Steph Curry

Steph Curry just signed a 10-year deal with Li-Ning and called it "the partnership of a lifetime." Let's talk about what Li-Ning's lifetime actually looks like.

In 2022, U.S. Customs and Border Protection banned every single Li-Ning product from entering the United States — not as a trade dispute, but because federal investigators concluded the company was using North Korean forced labor in its supply chain. That same year, Norway's sovereign wealth fund — the largest in the world at $1.3 trillion — dumped its entire stake in Li-Ning, citing what it called an "unacceptable risk that the company contributes to serious human rights violations" tied to Xinjiang. The Australian Strategic Policy Institute named Li-Ning in a report identifying companies directly benefiting from Uyghur forced labor transfer programs. The bipartisan Congressional-Executive Commission on China investigated Li-Ning's supply chain and formally urged NBA players to walk away from their endorsement deals with the company. And through all of it, Li-Ning publicly declared it uses Xinjiang cotton and intends to keep using it.

That's the company Steph Curry just handed his name and his legacy to for the next decade.

This isn't about geopolitics or asking an athlete to be a diplomat. It's about a man who has spent twenty years carefully constructing an image built on faith, integrity, and doing the right thing — and then signing with a company that U.S. federal investigators concluded was built, in part, on slave labor. The Congressional commission that investigated Li-Ning specifically called out NBA players by name and asked them to walk away. Curry didn't walk away. He ran toward them with a ten-year contract.

"Partnership of a lifetime," Steph. For Li-Ning, that's exactly right. Somebody else's lifetime. Somebody who never got a choice about it.

North Korean forced labor — U.S. Customs ban: https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2022/03/16/Li-Ning-China-ban-North-Korean-labor-customs-imports/4921647427576/

Xinjiang forced labor + Norway sovereign wealth fund divestment: https://sourcingjournal.com/topics/labor/li-ning-customs-border-protection-forced-labor-north-korea-xinjiang-334944/

Congressional pressure on NBA players to drop Li-Ning: https://sourcingjournal.com/topics/labor/li-ning-sporting-goods-north-korean-forced-labor-cbp-norges-334205/

Your Government Stole a Developer's Land and Handed It to His Competitor for a Parking Lot

 Bryan Bowers and his business partner Mike Licata saw an opportunity when a new hospital opened in downtown Utica, New York. Doctors in the area were looking for affordable office space, and Bowers signed a contract to buy a vacant lot at 411 Columbia Street — right across from the new hospital — and build a medical office building. It was straightforward private enterprise: willing seller, willing buyer, identified market demand. Then the doctors next door got involved. Central Utica Building LLC, which had already constructed its own medical office building on the adjoining property, didn't want competition cutting into its rental income. So it did what private businesses in New York apparently can do: it wrote a letter to the Oneida County Industrial Development Agency asking the government to seize Bowers' property using eminent domain and hand it over — not for a hospital, not for a road, not for a school, but for a private parking lot to serve their building. The agency agreed, citing vague "economic development" benefits. Bowers fought back through the New York courts and lost at every level. New York courts ruled that as long as a taking provides some conceivable public benefit — including easing the parking needs of a private medical business — eminent domain is fair game. The Institute for Justice took the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, backed by briefs from the Cato Institute, George Mason's Scalia Law School, and the Buckeye Institute. On March 24, 2025, the Supreme Court declined to hear it. The property that Bowers had under contract to develop is now a parking lot for his competitors. The Fifth Amendment's "public use" requirement, for practical purposes in New York, means nothing.

Getty Images - Unsplash.com

Commentary: A private company wanted its neighbor's land, asked the government to take it, and the government obliged — and every court in America up to the Supreme Court shrugged and said that's fine. The Fifth Amendment says government can only seize private property for "public use." New York's interpretation of "public use" is apparently "whatever a well-connected business asks for." Bryan Bowers' property is now a parking lot. Democracy dies in a surface lot.

📰 https://ij.org/press-release/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-challenge-to-infamous-kelo-eminent-domain-decision/

⚠️ This content was researched and written with AI assistance and may be fully AI-generated. All facts are sourced from the linked Institute for Justice press release and corroborating reporting from Inside Investigator, Rome Sentinel, and the official Supreme Court docket No. 24-670.

CCP Is Harvesting Organs From Living Prisoners and Selling Them on Demand

For decades, wealthy patients from around the world have traveled to China for organ transplants and received them within days — sometimes hours — of arriving. In every other country on earth, patients wait years for a compatible organ. The reason Chinese hospitals can guarantee near-instant availability is that they maintain a living inventory. An independent international tribunal chaired by Sir Geoffrey Nice — the lead prosecutor who convicted Slobodan Milošević for war crimes — spent twelve months reviewing testimony and evidence and concluded unanimously and beyond reasonable doubt that China has been harvesting organs from living prisoners of conscience on a massive, state-sanctioned scale for decades. The primary victims identified were Falun Gong practitioners, a peaceful spiritual movement that Beijing banned in 1999 and began systematically imprisoning. As the Uyghur detention system expanded in Xinjiang in the 2010s, investigators documented that Muslim minorities were subjected to mandatory blood typing and organ screening — the same preparation protocols used before extraction — and evidence now points to Uyghurs being killed for their organs as well. A Uyghur survivor testified before Congress on May 14, 2026 that local police told her directly that a detention center in her region had been converted into an organ extraction hospital and that the "halal organ trade is booming" — organs marketed specifically to wealthy Muslim buyers abroad who want religiously compliant transplants. Investigative journalist Ethan Gutmann, who has spent two decades building the evidentiary record, estimates that between 25,000 and 50,000 Uyghurs alone are killed for their organs annually. Despite Beijing's 2015 promise to rely only on voluntary donors, researchers have demonstrated that Chinese hospitals perform many times more transplants than voluntary donation could possibly supply — and the data has been falsified. On the same morning the May 14 Congressional hearing opened, a hot mic on Tiananmen Square captured Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin casually discussing living to 150 through continued organ transplants. The bipartisan commission co-chair called it exactly what it was: not small talk, but a glimpse behind the curtain of a system that treats human beings as interchangeable parts.

The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2018071010003673.

Commentary: Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin were caught on a hot mic joking about living to 150 on harvested organs — on the same morning Congress was hearing testimony that the Chinese state kills between 25,000 and 50,000 Uyghurs a year to supply the transplant market. There is no diplomatic euphemism adequate to describe a government that runs a living organ bank stocked with imprisoned minorities. The China Tribunal called it crimes against humanity. A U.S. Congressman called it execution by extraction. Both are correct.

📰 https://www.visiontimes.com/2026/05/14/congress-holds-hearing-on-forced-organ-harvesting-on-opening-day-of-trump-xi-summit.html

Additional sources: China Tribunal final judgment (2019) — chinatribunal.com | CECC hearing record May 14, 2026 — cecc.gov | Raoul Wallenberg Centre joint statement, May 2026 — raoulwallenbergcentre.org

⚠️ This content was researched and written with AI assistance and may be fully AI-generated. All facts are sourced from the linked articles, the 2019 China Tribunal final judgment, bipartisan Congressional testimony, and the Raoul Wallenberg Centre's May 2026 joint statement.

Your Government Killed an Innocent Man at the Wrong House and a Judge Called It Reasonable

 On a Wednesday night in April 2023, Robert Dotson — a 52-year-old father of two — heard knocking at his front door in Farmington, New Mexico just before midnight. He put on a robe, walked downstairs, picked up his legally owned handgun, and answered the door on his own property. Three police officers were standing outside, shining a flashlight in his face. They shot and killed him. The officers had been dispatched to a domestic violence call at 5308 Valley View Avenue. They went to 5305 — the house directly across the street. One officer had used his patrol car's GPS and placed the address on the wrong side of the street. A second officer had searched Google Maps, which correctly showed the house on the opposite side — and that officer verbally questioned whether they were at the right address before the knock anyway. They proceeded. When Dotson appeared at his door holding a firearm, blinded by flashlights, with no reason to believe the people outside were police, he raised the gun. The officers opened fire. He did not shoot. His wife then emerged, fired at the unknown figures outside, and only stopped when she realized they were officers. She was not told her husband was dead for eight hours. The officers did not immediately disclose to investigators that they had been at the wrong address — that detail was discovered by other officers who arrived on scene. No criminal charges were filed against the officers. When Dotson's family sued for civil rights violations, a federal judge dismissed the case in May 2025, ruling that the officers had acted reasonably given the circumstances — circumstances entirely of their own creation.

Tony Webster / tony@tonywebster.com

Commentary: A man answered his own front door with a legal firearm, got killed by police who had been told they were at the wrong address and went anyway, and a federal judge decided that's just how the Constitution works. The legal term for this is "qualified immunity." The plain English term is getting away with it.

📰 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-finds-police-acted-reasonably-shooting-new-mexico-man-wrong-addr-rcna208157

⚠️ This content was researched and written with AI assistance and may be fully AI-generated. All facts are sourced from the linked NBC News article and corroborating reporting from ABC News, CBS News, and Reason.

CCP Is Sentencing a 78-Year-Old Man to Die in Prison for Running a Newspaper

 Jimmy Lai built Apple Daily from scratch into Hong Kong's most widely read pro-democracy newspaper, a scrappy tabloid that spent decades doing what free press is supposed to do — holding government accountable and giving voice to people the powerful would prefer to silence. In August 2020, four months after Beijing imposed its sweeping National Security Law on Hong Kong, police raided Apple Daily's newsroom, arrested its senior journalists, and froze its assets. The paper was forced to shut down in 2021. Lai himself had already been in custody since December 2020, spending more than five years in solitary confinement awaiting trial. When his day in court finally came, it bore no resemblance to anything a functioning legal system would recognize: no jury, judges hand-picked by the Hong Kong government, his preferred British attorney barred from representing him on national security grounds, and an 855-page verdict delivered by a panel that ruled he had conspired to collude with foreign forces — the crime being that he had called on foreign governments to pay attention to what was happening in Hong Kong. On December 15, 2025, he was convicted. On February 9, 2026, he was sentenced to 20 years — the longest sentence ever handed down under the National Security Law — to be served consecutively with a separate five-year fraud sentence. Lai is 78 years old. He will not be eligible for parole until his late 90s. His health has severely deteriorated during his years of solitary confinement. Both the United States and United Kingdom have condemned the conviction as politically motivated. Donald Trump said he raised the case with China. Lai remains in prison.

Commentary: Beijing's message to every journalist, activist, and ordinary citizen in Hong Kong is written in Jimmy Lai's sentence: say the wrong thing about the Party and we will take everything — your newspaper, your freedom, your remaining years, and whatever health you have left. The crime wasn't collusion. The crime was running a newspaper that told the truth, and they needed five years, 855 pages, and a handpicked court to say so out loud.

📰 https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/08/china/jimmy-lai-sentenced-20-years-intl-hnk

⚠️ This content was researched and written with AI assistance and may be fully AI-generated. All facts are sourced from the linked CNN article and corroborating reporting from NPR, Human Rights Watch, AP, and the EU External Action Service.

Your Government Pointed a Gun at a 7-Year-Old and Then Sent Its Lawyers to Finish the Job

 In October 2017, an FBI SWAT team blew a flash-bang grenade outside a bedroom door in a west Atlanta home, stormed inside, and pointed weapons at the occupants — including seven-year-old Gabe Watson, who was yanked out of sleep and found himself staring down the barrel of a federal agent's gun. Agents realized within moments they had the wrong address. A GPS error had sent them to the wrong house on the wrong street. They left behind burned carpet, broken doors, fractured railings, and roughly $5,000 in property damage, plus a child who would later describe the raid as costing him his childhood. Trina Martin and her partner Toi Cliatt, the homeowners, asked the federal government for basic compensation for the damage done to their home and family. The FBI refused. The Justice Department then spent the next eight years arguing in court that the government was immune from being sued at all — that because the agents were technically ordered to raid a different house, the government bore no legal responsibility for what happened when they raided the wrong one. Lower federal courts agreed and threw the family's case out. The case finally reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously in June 2025 that the family could proceed with their lawsuit — sending the case back to the appeals court for further review. Gabe Watson, now 14, testified about the raid's lasting impact on his life. The lawsuit is still ongoing.

Commentary: The federal government's legal position — held for eight years and backed by armies of government lawyers — was essentially that blowing up the wrong family's home with a SWAT team is a clerical error the taxpayers aren't responsible for. It took a unanimous Supreme Court to tell them that maybe, just maybe, traumatizing a child at gunpoint in his own bedroom entitles his family to their day in court. Not a settlement. Not an apology. Just permission to sue.

📰 https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/12/politics/fbi-wrong-house-georgia-supreme-court

⚠️ This content was researched and written with AI assistance and may be fully AI-generated. All facts are sourced from the linked CNN article and corroborating reporting from NPR, ABC News, InvestigateTV, and SCOTUSblog.

CCP Is Hunting Christians in the Middle of the Night

 In October 2025, Chinese security forces launched one of the most coordinated crackdowns on Christianity seen in decades. In a single overnight operation, plainclothes and uniformed police fanned out across at least seven cities — Beijing, Shanghai, and five others — simultaneously detaining nearly 30 pastors, preachers, and congregation members of Zion Church, one of China's largest unofficial Protestant congregations with roughly 5,000 members nationwide. The operation's centerpiece was the arrest of Zion's 56-year-old founder and senior pastor, Ezra Jin Mingri, snatched while traveling in the southern city of Beihai. Church members describe watching the dragnet in real time, realizing from the speed and geographic reach that this was no ordinary raid — the CCP had been planning it for months. The detained were held incommunicado, with families receiving no information about their whereabouts and lawyers allowed only sporadic contact. The typical charge, applied with cynical precision: fraud. The government's logic is that since it does not recognize these pastors as legitimate clergy, collecting tithes from a congregation constitutes fraudulent solicitation. Within weeks, authorities escalated further — raiding another unofficial church in Wenzhou in December 2025, arresting approximately 100 members over five days, and surrounding the building with hundreds of armed police and bulldozers. In January 2026, they hit again, raiding the home of the current leader of Chengdu's Early Rain Covenant Church and taking him into custody. The crackdown is part of Xi Jinping's years-long "Sinicization" campaign — a program designed to remake every religion in China into an ideological arm of the Communist Party, rewriting scripture, banning unauthorized Bibles, demolishing crosses, and ensuring that Chinese Christians worship the Party first and God second.

Commentary: The CCP's approach to Christianity is simple and efficient: worship however you like, as long as what you're worshipping is us. Any congregation that insists on placing God above the General Secretary gets labeled a fraud operation, its pastors hauled away in the night, and its building surrounded by bulldozers — all perfectly legal under laws the Party wrote for exactly this purpose. It's religious freedom, Beijing-style.

📰 https://foreignpolicy.com/2026/03/25/china-churches-crackdown-xi-zion-jin-mingri/

⚠️ This content was researched and written with AI assistance and may be fully AI-generated. All facts are sourced from the linked article and corroborating reporting from Human Rights Watch and the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom.